Appearance
The content split
The question this answers: which of the app's output may a model write, and which may it never write?
Every other decision in this product bends around the answer. Read the ruling itself in ADR-0002 — Safety-critical content is extractive; only non-critical content is generated.
Where the line falls
Both categories are defined in the glossary — Safety-Critical Content, Conversational Content, Extractive, Source Span and Not Stated — and those definitions are the ones the rulings use.
What each ruling settles
| Question | Ruling |
|---|---|
| Where the hard line falls, and that a missing answer is a correct answer | ADR-0002 |
| What "AI summarisation" is permitted to mean | ADR-0012 |
| Whether a chatbot with retrieval crosses the line | ADR-0031 |
| Whether a curator may supplement a span from outside the SDS | ADR-0025 |
| Whether Thai text may be produced at runtime | ADR-0009 |
| Where the app's own authored wording — chrome — sits relative to Conversational Content, given that some of it is never displayed at all | ADR-0070 |
The two boxes in the diagram are the split. They are not a partition of everything the app puts on a screen: Chrome is a third glossary term, and CONTEXT.md carries the definition the rulings use. How it sits relative to Conversational Content is settled in ADR-0070, which was written after an earlier supporting sentence got that relation wrong.
Why this is the page people try to reopen
Three separate documents exist because three separate people-shaped pressures push against the same line, and each was resolved once and written down:
- "Make it read better." Answered in ADR-0012, which distinguishes choosing and laying out spans from rewriting their words.
- "Ground the model on the documents and let it answer." Answered in ADR-0002's rejected options and again, at length, in ADR-0031, which carries an explicit warning about the phrase that would be used to reopen it.
- "The SDS is vague here, and a standard says something better." Answered in ADR-0025.
Each of those ADRs carries a "This ruling may not be re-decided" section. That is not decoration: it names the specific improvement that was considered and rejected, so that a later reader recognises their own good idea in it.
What the split costs, and where that is recorded
The consequences are stated in the rulings rather than here — the app will sometimes refuse to answer (ADR-0002), Thai must be prepared ahead of time rather than translated on demand (ADR-0009), and the work of choosing spans lands on a person (ADR-0022). What that person's work costs is in Curation.
Where the line is enforced
| Mechanism | Where |
|---|---|
| Spec sections that require a Source Span on every safety element | Specification §7 |
| Test seams that assert selection never drops a Restriction | Specification, Testing Decisions |
| Glossary terms that make the two categories nameable | CONTEXT.md |